Jody Jazz HR* Tenor
Some hard rubber mouthpieces have both feet firmly planted in a dark round room with sound absorbent materials covering every surface so that the only edge you hear is when you bite the reed and play ff. The Jody Jazz HR* Tenor mouthpiece is in a different room than those afore mentioned hard rubber pieces. Jody’s HR* has a dark-heavy blend of dark and bright overtones. This piece is not bright by any means, but the tone does have a strong presence due to some brighter overtones and a slight edge. The dark edge gives the mouthpiece a kind of smoky sound and gives it a unique sound stamp. That sound stamp also proves to be the piece’s one weakness, but no mouthpiece is perfect, right?
The piece is effortless from low B-flat up to the upper echelon of the altissimo range whether playing softly, loudly, subtone, or full-tone. The sound remains full in the entire range of the horn, and the altissimo range retains a full body tone, which isn’t true of every mouthpiece as we’ll see later on. When tonguing the mouthpiece responds quickly giving it a light on its feet feeling. Unfortunately, the mouthpiece does break up when nearing the ff dynamic range. The smoky sound becomes slightly edgier or reedier and less pleasant, but this could vary with a harder strength reed or possibly a different brand of reed.
The dark-heavy mix of dark and bright overtones would lend well to many settings. I wouldn’t want to use it in a more contemporary fusion or funk setting, but George Garzone would beg to differ (and he always sounds great).
Conclusion: The piece has a nice mix of dark and bright overtones in a mainly round, dark, and strong sound setting . However, there is a reedy side that comes out when you really push the piece.
Jody Jazz Classic Tenor
The Classic model is somewhat of an enigma to me. You can buy the sleek looking mouthpiece in traditional black or in a transparent bold red, which was all fine and good until I had different playing experiences with the two colors of what should be the same mouthpieces. Both the red and black mouthpieces were marked with the same tip opening size and of identical shape. However, there were some physical differences to the mouthpieces. The red one was noticeably bigger, was much looser on my cork than the black piece, and came with the removable baffle currently advertized on the Jody Jazz Classic Tenor’s website page. So, I’ll have to proceed on the premise that there is something different about these two particular pieces. Maybe the black one is an older edition of the mouthpiece or something along those lines. I’ve emailed Jody Jazz and I’ll post an update when I know more about the situation. Without further ado...
Update: Jody Espina had the following to say on the general approach to playing his mouthpieces and observed difference between the mouthpieces:
"Very nice review, thank you. . . . it would be nice to know the tip opening and especially the reed strength. I find that when people are coming from other mouthpieces that aren't as free blowing they tend to use a softer reed and when they play a free blowing piece their reed is too soft to do the mouthpiece justice, especially in the high register. This is even more true on our DV and DV NY series where you definitely have to go up in reed strength to get the most out of the mouthpiece.
I can't explain the difference in those two pieces as the bore should be exactly the same. As far as the missing spoiler goes the store must have msiplaced it or had it stolen. Sam Ash has told us that our mouthpieces are the #1 stolen mouthpiece for them.
Thanks again for the review,
Jody Espina - President
JodyJazz"
The tip opening and reed strength can be found in the comment section now.
Ruby Red
Like I mentioned earlier, this mouthpiece sits looser on my cork. Looser than the HR*, looser than the black Classic, looser than my Florida Otto Link, and looser than many other mouthpieces I’ve played on. What does that mean? I have no idea, but I’m giving you fair warning that you might need a new cork if you buy one of these.
More seriously, this is a great playing mouthpiece. It’s another easy to play free-blowing mouthpiece, though in my experience it is slightly more resistant than the HR*. That slight resistance only helps the mouthpiece as I can push it to ff without any real change in the tone quality. The tone quality is also constant from low Bb up until the altissimo register where the sound quality does change. The altissimo register plays easily on the mouthpiece, but unfortunately it loses some of its depth of tone. With practice I’m guessing this could be overcome, at least in large degree, but I definitely noticed that of the 3 Jody Jazz mouthpieces I play tested, this one has the most noticeable tone quality change when playing altissimo.
The removable baffle that comes with the mouthpiece basically give you two mouthpieces in one. Without the removable baffle the tone has a nice balanced mix of dark and bright overtones, and the tone quality is generally round and vibrant. There is a slight edge in the sound, but it's just enough to enhance the sound quality and give it a strong presence. With the removable baffle in place the highs of the sound are brought to the forefront, and the piece’s edginess is also increased. The tone goes from a sound you might expect from a traditional or modern jazz musician to a tone you'd expect to hear from a contemporary smooth jazz musician or even a rock saxophonist. Basically, you have got options. All of that said, the highs emphasized by the removable baffle are not as vibrant as you what you would get from a metal mouthpiece designed for that purpose.
Conclusion: This is another easy to play free-blowing mouthpiece with a balanced mix of highs and lows. Without the spoiler you’ve got just enough highs and edge, and with the spoiler you’ve entered the funk, smooth jazz, and even rock scene though you might really want a metal mouthpiece for those musical situations. The only downside to the mouthpiece was its thinner though easy to play altissimo register.
Classic Black
This mouthpiece does not have a removable baffle in the box, and honestly, it does not need one. It's bright and edgy from the get-go. It is edgier than even the red Classic with the removable baffle in place. To my ears the mouthpiece sounds a little thin and was lacking some of the darker overtones it needs to complete the sound. The mouthpiece would definitely cut due to its bright and edgy nature, and it would appeal to saxophonists who need that ability and are looking to do it with a non-metal mouthpiece.
Despite the differences in sonic qualities the black Classic does have all the same free-blowing qualities of the red model. It's easy to play from bottom to top and at all dynamics. The altissimo register is easy to play, and the mouthpiece fully maintains its depth of tone in the upper register unlike the red Classic.
Conclusion: This is a bright and edgy mouthpiece and is meant to cut. Though a little thin sounding it maintains its sonic integrity from soft to loud and from low to the altissimo register. It would be an easy alternative for a musician looking for a cutting mouthpiece in a non-metal format.
I hope you’ve enjoyed this first review or found it helpful. Comments are welcome.
Test Setup: Jody Jazz Tenor HR* with Vandoren Optimum ligature and Rico Jazz Select Filed reeds, Jody Jazz Tenor Black & Red Classics with Rovner and normal 2 screw metal ligatures and Rico Jazz Select Filed reeds.
Normal Setup: Metal Florida Otto Link with Vandoren Optimum ligature and Rico Jazz Select Filed reeds.
Nice reviews Ben but how about some sound clips? ;) Also, knowing what the tip openings of the pieces and reed strength you used were would be valuable information.
ReplyDeleteEagerly waiting for the next one!
The tip openings were 6s for the Classics and a 7* for the HR*. I used 3 medium Rico Jazz Selects in all the situations.
ReplyDeletethe reason that the classic sounded so shrill and bright is because you need a wider tip opening for the thinner mouthpieces with a weaker reed. The HR* tip opening is good but a 6 is much to small. 7 or 8 for the classic would probably work better for you. I have the Jody Jazz DV and I love it, i have been researching both of these mouthpieces because i would like one of Mr. Espina's non-metals as well because his products are one of a kind.
ReplyDeleteInteresting info jj. I actually don't remember what the tip openings were at this point.
ReplyDeleteWhat exactly do you mean by "thinner" mouthpiece? The sound or the geometry or something else?
Appreciate the review of the HR* mouthpiece. I'm looking at getting one to try, since my Morgan Excalibur 7E is getting dated, and is just not the sound I like. My metal piece is an 80s Yanigasawa, and it's terrific for rock gigs, but too much of a hammer for most of the Jazz charts I'm playing right now.
ReplyDeleteAnton, I know a lot of guys who sound great on the Jody Jazz HR*. Hopefully it works for you.
DeleteHi Ben,
DeleteI ended up ordering a JJ HR*, and played it for a month or so, and just didn't love it. What's funny about this is I've just joined a sax quartet in Savannah, and our bari sax player works for Jody! They just got back from NAMM, in fact. I may just get Danielle to grab a few different models and try them out at the next rehearsal and see how I like them.
From a purely esthetic POV, I like the looks of the Ruby Red Classic...it would look cool on my bare brass Martin tenor. I'll see if they have any of those "behind the counter" that aren't being advertised.
I'll keep you posted.
In the meantime, I went back to playing my old Yani, as well as a new V16 metal with a Francoise ligature. It's...just okay.
Cheers,
Anton on Hilton Head